So, I tried this system with some volunteers. It went great. the hardest thing was to get the players to think of other solutions then fight, since fight in this system can, and will, go bad. The players chose to fight a bear, their PCs got somewhat mauled. Then again, the bear's defeat was sweeter then in any D&D clone.
As far as minimalist rulesets go, this one works well, however the one small nitpick I have is that there are no rules for healing. For example - can exhaustion points be removed by sleeping on a bench, or do you need at least a week in luxurious bedroom?
Thank you so much for trying our game! Love to hear that snatching victory from the jaws of defeat was a highlight for your players.
To answer your question re: conditions, we wrongly assumed that mechanics to remove them were unnecessary as the game world is modeled after our own reality. If you're tired? Sleep. If you're hungry? Eat. If you're freezing? Start a fire. To list all the possibilities would've inflated the book and to list only these few examples seemed like advice that didn't add to the text in a meaningful way. But if we had to do it again, I think I'd add a page on removing conditions anyway to keep gameplay simple and quick.
I am not sure if the assumption that mechanics to remove them were unnecessary was wrong, but I think there might be case for some misunderstanding on what the conditions represent. For me, at least, there is great deal of difference between tired and exhausted, being cold and freezing, thirsty and dehydrated and so on. The latter signifies you fucked up something somewhere.
If you walk for a day, you will be tired, sure. But if you walk for 72 hours straight because you are trying to get away from danger, you are exhausted, and even a day of sleeping on the ground in cold cave won't really help you recover. You go outside in high mountains, and you will be cold. But freezing means the frost starts to bite you, and while getting warm is good idea, there is a big difference between getting under blanket in well insulated cabin with fire roaring in the fireplace, and building a fire in the middle of a flat stone covered in foot deep snow, when it comes to treating frostbite.
So, if something needs to be clarified is how the conditions are to be read, because that informs how they could be treated.
I don't understand the dice pool - why is it pool? You effectively only have the CD, which means that instead of pool, it's a ladder (i.e. you only ever use one die that occasionally goes down by one in size)..right? Or am I missing something?
The truth is we didnt realize "Dice Pool" had a specific connotation with rolling multiple dice simultaneously when we wrote this. We know better now 😉
Cast Away is a short (20-pages) but content packed survival TTRPG. There are detailed rules for surviving in the wilderness after a horrible accident, and you get to use your polyhedral dice!
Just bought this game an absolutely adore it. Great, simple and thematic rule system!
My only real complaint is that it contains just one "scenario" (rainforest plane crash) where I think two or three (island shipwreck, arctic expedition gone wrong, etc.), would help "sell" the concept better.
That said, the huge amount of flexibility in setting makes coming up with new stuff a breeze; I've already developed a fair bit of homebrew for it and am writing up more right now!
One big question regarding the rules, though: how would a "hunt" under the vanilla rules work? For example, if a player is hunting a deer? If a player has the Hunting skill, they'd normally get a +2 to their Challenge rolls... but the rules say that a Contest of two opposing living beings (in this case, a deer vs player) should only use a player's raw CD without any Fortitude or skill bonuses. Does that mean the Hunting skill (and others like it) wouldn't be used in trying to kill a deer but only - say - in tracking/locating it? What about if a player wanted a Sharpshooter or Unarmed Combat skill (they're playing a military character)? If they can't use those skills in combat, would any combat-type skills be pointless to the system?
Thanks so much for supporting our new game, glad you enjoy it!
We're currently working on a pack of scenarios to supplement the game with three different settings and some alternate rules so keep an eye out for that coming ~March. We'll be hosting a jam to create your own scenarios then as well since the system is just perfect for generating survival scenarios. If you have a Discord, we'd love for you to drop into ours and share your homebrew stuff. Also, if you have any more questions we're pretty much always online.
As far as Hunting (Challenges) vs. Contests go, in the vanilla rules your example would play out something like this: Your hunter has bonuses to rolls involving tracking, sneaking up, and attempting to kill their target. As long as there isn't a more direct conflict between the two creatures, the bonuses are still calculated. However, if the initial hunt is unsuccessful and the creature becomes alerted and is actively running away or fighting back, the Contest rolls begin and are an attempt to simulate chaos or luck rather than pure skill. For example: If I'm skilled at Hunting and come across a bear, my skills might go out the window as the creature barrels down on me. At that point, it's less about how well you can track/shoot and more about whether or not one side or the other is lucky in a moment of panic.
That being said: We're releasing some examples in an update soon that adds a bit more depth to combat but mostly encourage you to make it your own. If adding +2 in a combat situation makes sense, go ahead and make it happen :D Just remember, a creature with a D4 against a combatant with a +2 will almostnever succeed. Anyway, we hope this helps clarify some things. Hope you drop in to say hello on Discord!
It's 14 pages, with a very cohesive visual design and clean, readable layout, and it uses some nice repurposed technical drawings to illustrate key elements and add immersion.
Despite the cover's first impression, Cast Away isn't anchored to a specific place or setting. It's versatile, as long as the thing you want to do with it is a wilderness survival situation. The included sample scenario is a plane crash in the 70s amazon rainforest, but without a doubt you could set your game anywhere from an oil platform in the ocean to a derelict lunar colony to a crypt city overrun with undead.
Mechanically, Cast Away does a very good job of covering the things it absolutely needs to cover, but it also does a good job of stepping back and letting the GM choose how situations progress. For example, every Survivor has a pool of dice for their HP and Skills. Every time they take damage (called Conditions) they remove the highest die from their pool. When they heal, they recover the lowest die out of the dice they're missing. This means that in any roll, the stakes are usually crystal clear. Either you're working to improve your situation, or you're working to stave off a Condition.
Additionally, decision-making is as important as dice-rolling. Let's say a Survivor drinks non-potable water. There isn't an express difficulty rating for that. The GM could choose to make up a target number and call for a roll, or they could simply say "you contract a parasitic infection," and then it's on the players to figure out how to manage their evolving situation.
This mix of "hands off" and "hands on" works really well for how the book engages with the material. In some ways, Cast Away's GM functions almost as a prompt, simply reminding the players of what their immediate problems are. The players do the rest, propelling the game forward under their own initiative.
Surprisingly, I think Cast Away might be an excellent first rpg or convention game. It's very easy to learn, the sheets are very well-composed, there's a cheat sheet for players to help make picking up the rules even faster, and the premise of Cast Away is extremely easy to engage with and automatically compelling.
You don't have to worry about figuring out adventure hooks in a survival scenario. The hook is to survive.
Of course, Cast Away does advertise itself as relatively lethal, but on reading through it seemed much less murdery than a standard osr low-fantasy game. Death in Cast Away usually comes through attrition, after a long struggle, and even then dead characters linger as a pool of dice that their player can spend to influence a few more rolls. It's mechanically neat, and it keeps people from checking out after they mulch a character.
As of 1/4/21, there *is* some relatively dark material that the book alludes to as potential character backgrounds, so you may want to have safety tools on deck, but that material is also not required for play. You can also use scenario crafting to tailor your scenarios to the tone that your group is looking for, whether it's brutal and exhausting or frantic and adventurous.
So overall, if you like tight, well-designed games, if you like survival scenarios or games that run perfectly at conventions, or if you've ever played dnd on a camping trip, I'd strongly suggest picking this up.
A simple, yet elegant ruleset that manages to have innovative mechanics. Encourages inventive and narrative play over "crunch". Ideal for alternative play formats like Play by Post and Play by Email. Would make for an amazing alternative to "ghost stories" around a camping trip campfire!
← Return to tabletop game
Comments
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.
So, I tried this system with some volunteers. It went great. the hardest thing was to get the players to think of other solutions then fight, since fight in this system can, and will, go bad. The players chose to fight a bear, their PCs got somewhat mauled. Then again, the bear's defeat was sweeter then in any D&D clone.
As far as minimalist rulesets go, this one works well, however the one small nitpick I have is that there are no rules for healing. For example - can exhaustion points be removed by sleeping on a bench, or do you need at least a week in luxurious bedroom?
Thank you so much for trying our game! Love to hear that snatching victory from the jaws of defeat was a highlight for your players.
To answer your question re: conditions, we wrongly assumed that mechanics to remove them were unnecessary as the game world is modeled after our own reality. If you're tired? Sleep. If you're hungry? Eat. If you're freezing? Start a fire. To list all the possibilities would've inflated the book and to list only these few examples seemed like advice that didn't add to the text in a meaningful way. But if we had to do it again, I think I'd add a page on removing conditions anyway to keep gameplay simple and quick.
I am not sure if the assumption that mechanics to remove them were unnecessary was wrong, but I think there might be case for some misunderstanding on what the conditions represent. For me, at least, there is great deal of difference between tired and exhausted, being cold and freezing, thirsty and dehydrated and so on. The latter signifies you fucked up something somewhere.
If you walk for a day, you will be tired, sure. But if you walk for 72 hours straight because you are trying to get away from danger, you are exhausted, and even a day of sleeping on the ground in cold cave won't really help you recover. You go outside in high mountains, and you will be cold. But freezing means the frost starts to bite you, and while getting warm is good idea, there is a big difference between getting under blanket in well insulated cabin with fire roaring in the fireplace, and building a fire in the middle of a flat stone covered in foot deep snow, when it comes to treating frostbite.
So, if something needs to be clarified is how the conditions are to be read, because that informs how they could be treated.
Well it sounds to me like you already have a pretty decent handle on the severity of conditions and how they might be stacked or reduced 😊
Tho, I think the average person walking for 72 hrs would probably die
https://www.veritastabletop.com/cast-away-review/
I don't understand the dice pool - why is it pool? You effectively only have the CD, which means that instead of pool, it's a ladder (i.e. you only ever use one die that occasionally goes down by one in size)..right? Or am I missing something?
The truth is we didnt realize "Dice Pool" had a specific connotation with rolling multiple dice simultaneously when we wrote this. We know better now 😉
Cast Away is a short (20-pages) but content packed survival TTRPG. There are detailed rules for surviving in the wilderness after a horrible accident, and you get to use your polyhedral dice!
Absolutely gorgeous game with so much potential for drama. For a full review, head here: https://podofblunders.com/2021/10/01/cast-away/
Just bought this game an absolutely adore it. Great, simple and thematic rule system!
My only real complaint is that it contains just one "scenario" (rainforest plane crash) where I think two or three (island shipwreck, arctic expedition gone wrong, etc.), would help "sell" the concept better.
That said, the huge amount of flexibility in setting makes coming up with new stuff a breeze; I've already developed a fair bit of homebrew for it and am writing up more right now!
One big question regarding the rules, though: how would a "hunt" under the vanilla rules work? For example, if a player is hunting a deer? If a player has the Hunting skill, they'd normally get a +2 to their Challenge rolls... but the rules say that a Contest of two opposing living beings (in this case, a deer vs player) should only use a player's raw CD without any Fortitude or skill bonuses. Does that mean the Hunting skill (and others like it) wouldn't be used in trying to kill a deer but only - say - in tracking/locating it? What about if a player wanted a Sharpshooter or Unarmed Combat skill (they're playing a military character)? If they can't use those skills in combat, would any combat-type skills be pointless to the system?
Thanks so much for supporting our new game, glad you enjoy it!
We're currently working on a pack of scenarios to supplement the game with three different settings and some alternate rules so keep an eye out for that coming ~March. We'll be hosting a jam to create your own scenarios then as well since the system is just perfect for generating survival scenarios. If you have a Discord, we'd love for you to drop into ours and share your homebrew stuff. Also, if you have any more questions we're pretty much always online.
As far as Hunting (Challenges) vs. Contests go, in the vanilla rules your example would play out something like this: Your hunter has bonuses to rolls involving tracking, sneaking up, and attempting to kill their target. As long as there isn't a more direct conflict between the two creatures, the bonuses are still calculated. However, if the initial hunt is unsuccessful and the creature becomes alerted and is actively running away or fighting back, the Contest rolls begin and are an attempt to simulate chaos or luck rather than pure skill. For example: If I'm skilled at Hunting and come across a bear, my skills might go out the window as the creature barrels down on me. At that point, it's less about how well you can track/shoot and more about whether or not one side or the other is lucky in a moment of panic.
That being said: We're releasing some examples in an update soon that adds a bit more depth to combat but mostly encourage you to make it your own. If adding +2 in a combat situation makes sense, go ahead and make it happen :D Just remember, a creature with a D4 against a combatant with a +2 will almost never succeed. Anyway, we hope this helps clarify some things. Hope you drop in to say hello on Discord!
Cast Away is a crunchy, compact survival RPG.
It's 14 pages, with a very cohesive visual design and clean, readable layout, and it uses some nice repurposed technical drawings to illustrate key elements and add immersion.
Despite the cover's first impression, Cast Away isn't anchored to a specific place or setting. It's versatile, as long as the thing you want to do with it is a wilderness survival situation. The included sample scenario is a plane crash in the 70s amazon rainforest, but without a doubt you could set your game anywhere from an oil platform in the ocean to a derelict lunar colony to a crypt city overrun with undead.
Mechanically, Cast Away does a very good job of covering the things it absolutely needs to cover, but it also does a good job of stepping back and letting the GM choose how situations progress. For example, every Survivor has a pool of dice for their HP and Skills. Every time they take damage (called Conditions) they remove the highest die from their pool. When they heal, they recover the lowest die out of the dice they're missing. This means that in any roll, the stakes are usually crystal clear. Either you're working to improve your situation, or you're working to stave off a Condition.
Additionally, decision-making is as important as dice-rolling. Let's say a Survivor drinks non-potable water. There isn't an express difficulty rating for that. The GM could choose to make up a target number and call for a roll, or they could simply say "you contract a parasitic infection," and then it's on the players to figure out how to manage their evolving situation.
This mix of "hands off" and "hands on" works really well for how the book engages with the material. In some ways, Cast Away's GM functions almost as a prompt, simply reminding the players of what their immediate problems are. The players do the rest, propelling the game forward under their own initiative.
Surprisingly, I think Cast Away might be an excellent first rpg or convention game. It's very easy to learn, the sheets are very well-composed, there's a cheat sheet for players to help make picking up the rules even faster, and the premise of Cast Away is extremely easy to engage with and automatically compelling.
You don't have to worry about figuring out adventure hooks in a survival scenario. The hook is to survive.
Of course, Cast Away does advertise itself as relatively lethal, but on reading through it seemed much less murdery than a standard osr low-fantasy game. Death in Cast Away usually comes through attrition, after a long struggle, and even then dead characters linger as a pool of dice that their player can spend to influence a few more rolls. It's mechanically neat, and it keeps people from checking out after they mulch a character.
As of 1/4/21, there *is* some relatively dark material that the book alludes to as potential character backgrounds, so you may want to have safety tools on deck, but that material is also not required for play. You can also use scenario crafting to tailor your scenarios to the tone that your group is looking for, whether it's brutal and exhausting or frantic and adventurous.
So overall, if you like tight, well-designed games, if you like survival scenarios or games that run perfectly at conventions, or if you've ever played dnd on a camping trip, I'd strongly suggest picking this up.
A simple, yet elegant ruleset that manages to have innovative mechanics. Encourages inventive and narrative play over "crunch". Ideal for alternative play formats like Play by Post and Play by Email. Would make for an amazing alternative to "ghost stories" around a camping trip campfire!
I love the conditions mechanic, I really dig games where injury impacts your effectiveness. It just feels more real, and it's really appropriate here.
The cover art is superb, as is the art throughout. Is that an old oil painting?
Thanks Gray! The shrinking die mechanics were a big part of developing this game, I'm glad it communicates our health system appropriately.
The cover is an old oil painting, good eye! We found this image in the public domain and knew right away that it fit our game perfectly.